3 Comments

NORML Responds to Opponents of Washington’s I-502 Legalization Campaign

By NORML February 25, 2012 NORML Responds to Opponents of Washington’s I-502 Legalization Campaign
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

"For those who feel they cannot support the current initiative, because it is not perfect, we would hope they would step aside and take no public position, in order not to undermine what is an historic opportunity to end marijuana prohibition, by popular vote, under state law." -- Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director

WASHINGTON, DC — This November, voters in Washington will be asked to approve Initiative Measure No. 502 (I-502), which would license and regulate marijuana production, distribution, and possession for persons over twenty-one; remove state-law criminal and civil penalties for activities that it authorizes; tax marijuana sales; and earmark marijuana-related revenues.

While most of the opposition to I-502 is coming from the usual suspects—law enforcement, drug treatment providers, and prosecutors—some of it is coming from a segment of the state’s medical marijuana community, which worries that the measure’s setting a limit on THC levels to determine impairment in drivers could result in non-impaired patients being prosecuted.

A group calling themselves Patients Against I-502 has the medical marijuana community in Washington divided, and are working to defeat the legalization measure. On Friday, Allen St. Pierre, Executive Director for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) issued the following “Official Reply to ‘Patients Against I-502′ on the NORML blog:

NORML supports (and publicly endorses when requested by the principal organizers) marijuana legalization, regulation, and medical use initiatives that qualify for the state ballot, so long as they move us closer to full legalization, even if they contain provisions we do not believe should be included in a perfect proposal.

Every cannabis law reform initiative dating back to the 1972 proposal in CA has included some flaws, but nonetheless when the initiatives have been approved, marijuana consumers, (including those who use cannabis for medical reasons) benefit by legal protections that did not exist under prior law.

When any marijuana law reform initiative qualifies for the ballot, it instantly creates a much needed public policy discussion and debate about the need to end cannabis prohibition. The mainstream media, editorial boards, columnists and radio talk shows FINALLY start to focus on the problems created by 74 years of prohibition and the benefits of alternative public policies.

The value of this public discussion, even if the initiative loses, clearly moves us closer to eventual victory.  For example, Prop. 19 in CA, which ended up getting nearly 47% of the vote, sparked a national debate over the merits of legalization that helped move the support for full legalization to the highest point ever, measured by a recent Gallup poll as 50% support nationwide.

At NORML, we support these efforts, even when imperfect, because the greater good achieved by legalization proposals outweighs the imperfect language; and what flaws exist in individual initiatives can be amended in future legislation (or if necessary, via another voter initiative). But in the meantime, tens of thousands of marijuana arrests are avoided by the new law.

We fully recognize the per se DUI marijuana provisions in I-502 are arbitrary, unnecessary, and unscientific, and we argued strongly with the sponsors for provisions that would require proof of actual impairment to be shown before one could be charged with a traffic safety offense. NORML, arguably more so than any other drug law reform organization, has a long track record of opposing the imposition of arbitrary and discriminatory per se traffic safety laws for responsible cannabis consumers. But we failed to persuade the sponsors of I-502, and now we must decide whether to support the initiative despite those provisions. We believe the overall impact of this proposal, if approved by voters this fall and enacted, will be overwhelmingly helpful to the vast majority of cannabis consumers in the state, and will eliminate tens of thousands of cannabis arrests each year. Thus, NORML’s Board of Directors voted unanimously (including the two members from WA) to endorse the initiative, while maintaining our opposition to per se DUID provisions in principal.

Additionally, at NORML we also support the right of consumers to grow their own marijuana, and there is no such legal protection in the WA initiative. However, qualified patients already protected under existing law will be able to continue to grow cannabis, as I-502 does not alter existing medicinal cannabis laws. The sponsors found through their polling that the inclusion of the right to cultivate marijuana for personal adult use would reduce their level of public support below that needed for approval. Again, while we continue to support personal cultivation, we believe the initiative still deserves our support, despite this calculated omission by I-502’s sponsors.

We would urge those who support marijuana legalization, but oppose specific provision of I-502, to nonetheless support this initiative because of the importance of 1.) having one state actually approve legalization and confront the federal government on this issue, and 2.) stopping thousands of expensive and damaging arrests, prosecutions and incarcerations annually in WA for cannabis-related offenses, notably for simple possession.

For those who feel they cannot support the current initiative, because it is not perfect, we would hope they would step aside and take no public position, in order not to undermine what is an historic opportunity to end marijuana prohibition, by popular vote, under state law.

Section 28 of Washington Initiative 502 explicitly earmarks tax revenue generated by the law for purposes related to general public health, drug-abuse treatment, drug-abuse prevention, marijuana research and administration of the program, with any excess revenue not used for administration going to the state’s general fund.

  , , ,
  • Corey Donahue

    NORML is full of shit.  Is this the same Allan St. Pier that called medical marijuana a sham?  Is this the same NORML that supported the 5ng thc limit in Colorado?  A limit that the people of Colorado fought back and won with no help from NORML.  These jerk offs don’t want to end prohibition they want to control legalization so they can continue to justify their jobs.  Down with I-30 in Colorado and I-502 in Washington.

    • Evan

      Anything that brings us closer to legalization is a good thing… Keeping it illegal is causing too much damage.

  • Duke-mizchif

    This is great!

    I live in Canada, and we currently have it decriminalized, but nothing like this is going on.
    I wish we could spark discussion about it, but we keep getting the same Right Wing Run Around.