Washington State Releases Proposed Recreational Marijuana Rules

Washington State Releases Proposed Recreational Marijuana Rules

SEATTLE, WA —  Eight months after voters approved the Initiative 502, legalizing the  adult use of marijuana, officials in Washington have taken the first steps towards establishing rules for the state’s new recreational marijuana industry.

The 46 pages of draft regulations announced by the state Liquor Control Board Thursday  include “seed to store” tracking of marijuana, limits on the number of retail outlets per county, bans of marijuana extracts, including hash, oils, and concentrates, and mandatory 24-hour video surveillance at all marijuana related businesses.

A sample label provided by the Liquor Control Board

A sample label provided by the Liquor Control Board

Labeling requirements for marijuana and infused edible products would be required to warn that consumption of marijuana “may be habit forming,” and are unlawful outside of Washington State.  An official state-issued logo featuring Washington state with a marijuana silhouette in the middle would also be required on all packages and labels.

Consuming marijuana at a marijuana store would be prohibited, including Amsterdam style coffee shops or marijuana bars or lounges.

Chair of the Washington State Liquor Control Board, Sharon Foster, says the board is trying to create a tightly regulated system that not only conforms to the wishes of the voters, but also allows companies large or small an equal place in the pot market.

The regulations are based on “hundreds of hours of internal research and deliberation, consultation with multiple industry experts and input from the over 3,000 individuals who attended our forums statewide,” Foster said Thursday.

Also among the regulations are there would be advertising restrictions, including a ban on ads intended to appeal to those under 21.

Washington would use a criminal history point system in determining whether someone is eligible for obtaining a license to grow, sell or process marijuana.  One felony in the past decade or two misdemeanors in the past three years would disqualify an applicant, unless the charges were marijuana-related.  Up to two marijuana possession misdemeanors or any single state or federal conviction for selling, growing or possessing marijuana could be waived on a case-by-case basis.

Under I-502, the Liquor Control Board was given the task of establishing the guildelines for the marijuana industry. Here are some of the highs (and buzzkills) of the proposed regulations:

  • No sales of marijuana extracts, such as hash, oils or dabs, would be allowed unless infused into another product, such as edibles.
  • Marijuana labeling would be required to include serving sizes, use-by date, allergy info.
  • Any marijuana product sold at a state-licensed stores would carry a label noting that it “may be habit forming”
  • All marijuana products would be required to be kept behind the counter, or any locked area where customers don’t have direct access
  • All marijuana establishments would be 21+ only.
  • Marijuana businesses must be located more than 1,000 feet, as measured as the shortest straight line distance, from playgrounds, child care centers, public parks, public transit centers, elementary or secondary schools, recreation centers, library, or arcades that do not restrict admission to those 21 or older.
  • Marijuana retail stores can not be located within another business, and operate only between the hours of 6 am and 2 am
  • Marijuana stores may not allow the consumption of marijuana or marijuana-infused products on the premises.
  • Advertising restrictions include limiting the signs and exterior advertising for marijuana retail stores, as well as prohibits any advertising targeting minors, promotes over consumption, or claims that “the use of marijuana has curative or therapeutic effects”
  • One “serving size” of marijuana would be defined as 10 mg active THC, with the size of any marijuana infused products limited to 10 servings.
  • Marijuana transaction limits would be set at one ounce of marijuana, 16 ounces of solid marijuana infused products (food items) or 72 ounces of marijuana infused liquids in a single retail transaction
  • For growers, any plant waste matter that isn’t utilized, such as the roots, stems or leaves, would be required to be “rendered unusable” by mixing with soil, compost or food waste
  • All marijuana would be required to be tested by third party, independent labs for quality and safety.  Upon the customer’s request, the marijuana retail outlet must disclose the name of the testing facility to the customer.
  • There would be mandatory quality standards, and any marijuana that fails to meet quality standards would be required to immediately be rendered unusable.
  • Any pesticides, herbicides, or fungicides used in growing marijuana must be fully disclosed
  • All marijuana must be grown in an enclosed, locked facility
  • Growers, processors and retailers must notify the Liquor Control Board of any marijuana shipments
  • Growers would need to keep extensive records of all plants from seed to shipment.
  • Marijuana businesses would be prohibited from employing anyone under 21
  • Criminal and financial background checks would be conducted of applicants and anyone who invests more than $10,000 in a marijuana business.
  • Labeling requirements include the following mandatory statements:
    • “Warning: Smoking may be hazardous to your health”
    • “There may be health risks associated with consumption of this product”
    • “For use only by adults 21 and older. Keep out of reach of children”
    • “Marijuana can impair concentration, coordination, and judgment. Do not operate a vehicle or machinery under the influence of this drug”
  • Marijuana infused products intended to be eaten would also be required to state the following:
    • “This product is infused with marijuana or active compounds of marijuana”
    • “Caution: when eaten, the intoxicating effects of this drug may be delayed by two or more hours”
  • The Concentration of THC, THCA, CBD, CBDA, CBN, CBG, including a total of active cannabinoids (potency profile) would also be required on all products.
  • Any organic marijuana or marijuana products must be certified organic by the Washington State Department of Agriculture
  • There is a three-month residency requirement for applying to open any marijuana related business

This is only the first step of the rule making process for the Liquor Control Board, who will ultimately will oversee the growers, sellers, producers and processors of marijuana and marijuana-related products.  The board will now begin accepting  comments on the proposed rules, and with plans to use reaction to help shape more formal draft rules in June.

The Liquor Control Board’s goal is to finalize the rules in August, when they will begin a 30-day application process for growers, sellers and distributors.  Once the 30 day application window closes, the Liquor Control Board will not accept any new applications until such time as they determine it necessary to re-open the application process.

The Liquor Control Board hopes to issue licenses by December 1.

Marijuana sales in Washington should begin in early 2014, unless the Department of Justice attempts to intervene, as marijuana remains federally illegal.

Washington state Governor Jay Inslee said Thursday he believes that the state is “on the right track” to make legal, recreational cannabis sales a reality.

“I’m impressed with the depth and thoughtfulness of their approach and look forward to moving forward,” he said of the Liquor Control Board’s efforts, adding that he hoped that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder would be satisfied by the state’s regulation.

“I don’t think you can design a system with much more integrity, as far as tracking the product from the producer to the consumer,” Inslee said. “This plan has a robust system of controls and checks in a variety of ways.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/mikero.organix MikeRo Organix

    Many people feel it is more healthy to forgo smoking the inactive plant matter and only vaporize small amounts of concentrates. Sad to see their prejudice and lack of understanding of extracts.

    • Mike

      Excellent point on the very real value of ingested cannabis and the problem with what is shaping up to be the Washington model. Ingestion requires significantly higher dosages, but can actually result in more limited psychotropic effects than smoking or vaporizing (I will not diss either one, though) cannabis. Even when I was growing my own, I rarely produced enough for more than occasional use of ingested cannabis. I needed to smoke the bulk what I produced; I couldn’t afford to eat it. I would have been less stoned and better medicated if only I had affordable access to cannabis to ingest it regualrly.

      Without going into details, it seems they are fixing the potency/dosage of anything ingested in relation to what they judge to be the smoked equivalent. If you’re not worried about making huge profits, collecting enormous taxes, or hustling your fellow man, it becomes clear the regs as proposed will tend to prevent affordable and available ingested products in a closely state-regulated model.

      It’s the 3.2 version of marijuana liberty because they think the public can’t deal with this appropriately. And just like the cartels, they know what’s good for us.

      Thanks, drunk uncle.

  • Crass B

    This is absurd. No hash or concentrates? Get real people. Plus they don’t allow personal grows in Washington. Absurd.

  • Mike

    Clearly overkill in some areas, but a good start.

    The one indefensible issue is the lack of home grow. The government should not delude itself into thinking that people will think that the lack of home grow is acceptable. It’s not.

    Failing to accommodate it at a reasonable scale strongly suggests that the government is more interested in maximizing revenues to it than in creating a fair and just legal place for marijuana akin the beer and wine — but largely lacking the negative effects of alcohol. It also sets up a foundation to perpetuate the existing system and structure of drug war with prohibitionlite, instead of devoting those funds and resources to areas where government could do more good and be more effective.

  • http://www.facebook.com/yackery Robert Proctor

    Prohibition is wrong. For cannabis: 1) Repeal all cannabis prohibition except for any transfer to a minor. 2) Set a legal limit of intoxication that indicates recent use like 50ng/ml. 3) Maintain that employers continue any fair and uniform test level. 4) Any outright dealing requires a license. 5) Activities necessary to dealing like growing or storing or shipping quantities of pounds require bonding.
    Federal involvement should be minimal. Done.

    • http://twitter.com/buddhacosmos Sean Alan Romanek

      Ilike that RECPOT Proctor.

      • http://www.facebook.com/yackery Robert Proctor

        Thanks. Includes hash. Mine should be the most-liked comment on this page!

  • http://www.facebook.com/albert.broman Albert Broman

    Most all of the problems that people have with the rules traces directly to the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 and marijuana being included as a Schedule 1 drug along with heroin. All efforts must go to getting that changed. It is simply indefensible by anyone with any common sense. Politicians need to be called to account for this travesty. The states are afraid of going too far against the federal government. Remove marijuana from Schedule 1 status and things would be a lot better.
    The lack of a home grow means people will still face prosecution for growing a little weed, but they can make whiskey. That is hypocrisy. And excluding concentrates shows a complete lack of understanding on the part of the bureaucrats making the rules.

  • chuck

    You CAN legally grow in Washington state – providing you’re a card carrying medical cannabis patient. 15 plants per patient, up to 45 plants at any one location max with up to 5 patients to qualify as a collective garden. That’s the problem right now for some of the larger, more popular dispensaries. They can’t grow enough (at one location) for themselves and so they have to buy from their patients who happen to be growing and have extra to sell back to them. I know in Arizona the dispensaries have no plant numbers limit as to how much they can grow providing they sell all their product through their dispensary, from what I understand.

    Not so here. Of course it doesn’t say 15 small or 45 medium sized plants – if I was growing outside with a 15 to 45 plant limit, whichever number I was producing, I KNOW FOR A FACT (through 40 years of….personal experience & being a Master Gardener) with the genetics that are readily available at numerous locations both on the internet and here in Washington state locally, that most anyone with common gardening knowledge, the gardening space and the right outdoor genetics (seeds or clones) that would be ready & harvested in September, should be able to knock out 1 pound of finished cannabis bud per plant at harvest fairly easily. You can do the rest of the math however you want. But anyone who says you can’t grow excellent cannabis outdoors here in western Washington state has been out of the game too long. In the old days that was (mostly) true. But in our modern connected world, world class genetics that makes outstanding cannabis (and products made from it) whether grown indoors OR outdoors, is a choice everyone has these days. Excellent quality LEGALLY PRODUCED bud in Washington state isn’t grown only indoors.

  • Pingback: Washington State Releases Proposed Recreational Marijuana Rules | THC Media | Alternative - Grass Roots - Counter Culture()

  • firetheliberals

    With these rules, it is hard to see how a small basement grower could make any profit. The state is controlling the price.
    For example, 24 hour recorded security surveillance, 72 hour quarantined areas aftet harvest, submission of floor plans, self transportation. All of the add up to costs that eat away at profits.

    Even worses, processors have to adhere to commercial codes which eliminates home cooking..

    It is obvious to me that recreational weed will be Marlboro green. Thank God, we have medicinal..

  • General Butt Naked

    Well,I’m sitting here being happy to be in California with a valid MMJ card.
    The only people that are going to be able to do business in Washington Srate are big corporations.The worst part of this FAKE legaliization is not being able to grow your own cannabis legally.Also according to the regulations,unless you have a greenhouse that is the closest you’ll get to growing full sun outdoor weed.
    People in Washington need to get medical recommendations and boycott this new recreational marijuana industry.

  • Pingback: Seattle Officials Want Private Pot Clubs, Home Delivery of Marijuana()

  • Pingback: Seattle Officials Want Private Pot Clubs, Home Delivery of Marijuana | What Is Marijuana? | Just The Facts About Marijuana()

  • Pingback: Moving Toward Legal Marijuana Commerce in Washington State()

  • Pingback: Moving Toward Legal Marijuana Commerce in Washington State | What Is Marijuana? | Just The Facts About Marijuana()

  • Pingback: Washington LCB Reconsiders Allowing Outdoor Marijuana Growing, Hash & Dabs | The Daily Chronic()

  • Pingback: Washington LCB Reconsiders Allowing Outdoor Marijuana Growing, Hash & Dabs | What Is Marijuana? | Just The Facts About Marijuana()

  • Pingback: Washington State Moving Towards Allowing Outdoor Marijuana Cultivation()

  • Pingback: Washington State Moving Towards Allowing Outdoor Marijuana Cultivation | What Is Marijuana? | Just The Facts About Marijuana()

  • Pingback: Latest Washington Marijuana Rules: Outdoor Grows, Concentrates In; Pot Logo Out | The Daily Chronic()