Massachusetts to Licence Only 11 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, Eliminate Interim Access

Massachusetts to Licence Only 11 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, Eliminate Interim Access

In what advocates are calling a "wrecking ball swung through the entire medical pot community at once," the state's health department will only licence 11 of 35 voter-approved medical marijuana dispensaries, and are prohibiting caregivers from providing medial marijuana to more than one patient.

BOSTON, MA — The Massachusetts medical marijuana community is in an uproar after state officials announced Friday that only 11 medical marijuana dispensaries would be licensed out of a possible 35 state wide, and none would be in Boston.

Meanwhile, in what advocates are calling a “wrecking ball swung through the entire medical pot community at once,” the state’s health department began cracking down on medical marijuana caregivers who have been filling the needs of patients while officials continue to delay implementation of the medical marijuana law voters approved in 2012.

Massachusetts voters approved medical marijuana in 2012. (file)

Massachusetts voters approved medical marijuana in 2012 by 63% state wide. (file)

When Massachusetts voters overwhelmingly approved Question 3in 2012 with over 63% of the vote state wide (not to mention majority approval in 349 of the state’s 351 cities and towns), they did so with the understanding that up to 35 medical marijuana dispensaries would be allowed to open statewide.

If dispensaries were not open within 180 days of the law taking effect — which it did on January 1, 2013 — then a hardship clause would allow medical marijuana patients and their caregivers to cultivate medical marijuana until dispensaries open.

It has now been 543 days since Massachusetts officially became the 18th medical marijuana state, but relief to thousands of medical marijuana patients in the Bay State is still far away — if ever at all.   And with recent developments this week, patients’ current access to medical marijuana has become all but non-existent.

The authors of Question 3 created a realistic time frame for the state to implement the medical marijuana law. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) was given 120 days from the enacting of the law to create the rules and regulations for the state-supervised medical marijuana program. The DPH then had until January 2014 to approve the applications and issue registrations to the dispensaries, and then another 90 days to licence and approve the dispensaries to open.

That deadline has come and gone, and the first dispensaries are still months away. State officials said Friday that the first dispensaries could open as early as November, but most will likely not open until February 2015.   Officials also announced Friday that only 11 of the 20 dispensaries previously approved would be licensed, leaving several of the state’s largest cities — including Boston, Cambridge, Springfield and Worcester – without a dispensary.

The eleven dispensaries that have advanced to the  “Inspection Phase” of the selection process would be located in Ayer, Brockton, Brookline, Dennis, Haverhill, Lowell, Newton, Northampton, Milford, Quincy and Salem.

These 11 dispensaries will be given provisional certificates allowing them to set up operations and undergo inspections, Karen van Unen, executive director of the state’s medical marijuana program, said Friday.

Because of some anticipated bureaucracy surrounding the implementation of the medical marijuana program in Massachusetts, the authors of Question 3 wrote safeguards into the legislation approved by voters.  Knowing that it would take time for dispensaries to be licensed and open, the authors of the ballot measure incorporated cultivation by patients and caregivers into the law, but only until such time as dispensaries were open or if the patients live more than 30 miles from a dispensary once they are operational.

However, in the spring of 2013 the DPH released regulations for the medical marijuana program, which included a provision that caregivers could “only supply marijuana to one patient at a time.”  Patients, advocates and caregivers alike called the single-patient restriction “unreasonable and unworkable,” while state officials and police admit that the regulation is vague and open to interpretation.

Since then the DPH has looked the other way while over a dozen caregivers in the state filled the void left by bureaucratic incompetence and supplied medical marijuana to thousands of patients seeking relief.   Caregivers say they only ever provide medical marijuana to “one patient at a time” and are following sate law and health regulations, noting that they submit paperwork to the state for every patient they supply with medicine.

All that changed this week, however, when state health officials began cracking down on what the Boston Globe calls a “booming cottage industry” by sending letters to over 1,300 patients and 17 caregivers, warning them that state regulations only allow for caregivers to provide medical marijuana to one patient at a time.

“Unfortunately, the caregiver you specified has been designated by more than one qualifying patient,” the letters read.  “Pursuant to DPH Regulations, an individual may not serve as a personal caregiver for more than one registered qualifirinq [sic] patient at one time.”

The letters inform the patients that until the dispensaries open, “you may choose a new personal caregiver, or determine that
you no longer require the services of a personal caregiver at this time,” adding that the caregivers, not the patients, were violating the law.

“They so easily say you can just find another caregiver or not use one at all,” says Scott Murphy, a 31-year-old Iraq veteran, who is president of Veterans for Safe Access and Compassionate Care.  Murphy is also a medical marijuana patient who uses marijuana to ease the pain of his degenerative arthritis.

“It does not seem like a patient-centered approach. It is not that easy to grow your own, and that takes three or four months. This is not fair,” Murphy wrote in a letter to the Department of Public Health, saying that he believes they are misinterpreting the medical marijuana law as passed by voters.

One of the state’s best known caregivers, longtime marijuana activist Bill Downing, says he stopped providing medical marijuana to patients this week after receiving a cease and desist letter from state health officials.

One of the founding members of the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition (MassCann), the state chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), Downing is encouraging his patients to join a lawsuit he is filing against the state.

“The one-patient-per-caregiver regulation is illegal,” Downing told the Boston Globe. “It’s causing great harm.”

Downing added that the Department of Public Health “is more concerned with their regulations than they are with the well-being of the citizens of Massachusetts.”

You May Also Enjoy These Articles

  • John H Johnson III

    The only regulation Massachusetts needs is for the state to ensure they have cannabis that is mold, pesticide and bug free. Anyone who can open a dispensary and sell a safe product should be able to do so with a reasonable licensing fee of $50 or so.

    No dispensary limits, no caregiver limits, nothing else.

  • Mike

    Massachusetts voters opted to lower the barriers to allow patients access to legal cannabis. Did someone forgot to tell the bureaucrats they’re now responsible for helping patients, NOT “suspects,” to obtain the medical cannabis they need? And it is unconscionable to exclude so many patients suddenly when the bureaucracy can’t get it’s act together.

    And shouldn’t someone be going to jail for not having things ready in 180 days? They broke the law. Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time…Oh, you say that’s just for little people? Sad that so little seems to have changed despite the clear-cut wishes of voters being expressed.

  • Edo Edo

    Good lord… These type of stories are becoming nauseating. Can we just legalize this to be sold over the counter with a valid photo ID by a pharmacist who can advise on strand and potency? And then we can be done with this bureaucratic nonsense…

  • Hansjurg

    I don’t think you understand.

    F&%K the skeptical doctors, the chain pharmacies, and especially F#&K the pharmaceutical industry.

    • Tom Paine

      F&%K n A !! Re-legalize no taxes and no regulations !

  • Mike

    GW Pharma?

    Your comment about the need for home grow as an option is commendable.

    It also totally conflicts with your support for Big Pharma. Who’s side are you on here? The whole plant and its natural variations and derivatives are all we need, not some patented crap that is chemically processed into who knows what.

    Caregivers are not the problem here. It’s the legal status of the plant and the patients who need it. You’d be far better off pointing out how prohibition is at the root of most things that people think are wrong with cannabis in general and, even more specifically, with medical cannabis. You’d rather beat up on little people who are as trapped in this ridiculous system as the patients are. What drivel…

  • James Pherris

    I have stage four cancer of the head and Bill is my caregiver. While all the drug dealers are still in business the guy who did everything by the book has been shut down. One of the main reasons we have a MM law is because of him and IMO this is retaliation from the Commonwealth at my expense. No surprise but a request for an injunction will be filed any day now.

    IMO even IF and when the dispensaries open I still want Bill because I trust him, not a business that knows and cares little about they do besides making money and paying themselves a hansom paycheck on my dime. Bill Downing has always been fair to me and has my respect and gratitude.

  • Tom Paine

    A free citizen has a natural right to control their own body. These dunces in the State House hate Liberty and Our Founders would agree.